Deputy Director Cao Weiguo provided business training and guidance, and put forward three requirements for defense and evaluation discipline: firstly, strictly follow the qualification conditions for evaluation and grasp the evaluation scale; Secondly, strictly regulate the evaluation process and conduct the defense in accordance with the evaluation rules; The third is to strictly abide by the evaluation discipline and consciously abide by the confidentiality system.

Deputy Director Zhu Ming put forward three opinions on the evaluation: firstly, to conscientiously fulfill duties and enhance the sense of responsibility for the evaluation work; Secondly, adhere to standards and make objective and fair evaluations; The third is to strictly keep secrets and maintain discipline in the work of professional title evaluation.

Group leader Gu Shaojun expressed gratitude to the competent department for their support and concern towards the group's independent review work. He requires all expert judges to exercise their review powers with a serious and serious attitude, based on the principles of fairness and impartiality. They must strictly abide by the principle of "one qualified, one passed", and allow those who truly have project management and technical capabilities to pass the review. They must be responsible to the applicant, the company, and the higher-level supervisory department; At the same time, the evaluation of professional titles should be combined with the cultivation of professional and technical talents in the group, and potential talents should be identified through the application and defense of evaluation materials.

Qian Hong, the Chief Engineer of the Group, serves as the Director of the Jury and presides over the meeting.

After the meeting, the expert judges studied the evaluation documents and divided them into four professional (disciplinary) groups to review 49 application materials, forming preliminary assessment opinions.

On the afternoon of September 30th, the expert judges were divided into 2 assessment groups and 4 defense groups. The 49 applicants who passed the review and submitted to the judging committee were assessed through a combination of on-site defense and video conferencing.

After the defense, the judging committee held a voting and discussion meeting with the executive committee, and the independent evaluation of intermediate professional titles was successfully completed.